Gods cool 

Some (not all) prior works, as these overlap. These are listed as they happen to have built up to a realization one is very real within reality, and reality may be more coherent than commonly understood to be, with fewer ceilings of understandability than may be assumed, and that it is not shaping up to be an unpromising picture, including the civilizational model, which seems to be running and running on an error rather than this being its default stance, needlessly increasing civilizational entropy and inefficiency even to the detriment of perpetrating lobbies and interests, as better, practical ways were and remain possible that would serve their interests better and reduce loose ends for them, and not in a top-down or imposed way but as per healing or correcting natural gaps or errors carried forward and so also happen to trim excesses of dead weight carried forward, or renovate and repair matters along the way. Examples are given in other essays, the note at the end, and so on. These are meant to clarify fundamental and irreducible experienced foundations and some more abstract aspects, so better questions can be asked within more coherence, more optimal navigation may be attempted by those wishing to, and more can begin being understood regarding what existence is. All are original works and can be found on this profile, and the first two on schehrzade.substack.com, although not all my works are shared online: 

1. We established reality when it is being experienced is very “real” and has implications and things worth discovering towards more possible coherence and (i) we don’t escape an overlap with Reality, whatever dream, simulation or etc realm we may assume, as either via primary contact or the substratum upon which our experience is, which, in itself, creates primary contact with reality to be able to exist as reality, or a simulation or dream or such, (which also means we may now learn more if we explore reality on two realms-one is experienced reality for optimal navigation and understanding of such and the second may be using that direct overlap/perception/being of reality with any underlying reality to understand reality, and implications of how it has led to domains of order even if in a simulation, or otherwise) while (ii) we have established the reality experienced in waking can be navigable and understandable even in complexity as it emerges, sometimes across domains and despite complexity, despite ones inferior status of conscious control and lack of complete conscious knowledge of its complexity while experiencing it and (iii) may be more understandable within what emerges as experienced reality, and that there is a structure of understandability, as well as a process of understandability helping evolve prior understandability, making ceilings of what can be known logically arbitrary to place. (iv) We have also established how whatever is experienced as consciousness in humans is irreducible in axioms of physics, and not just metaphysical. ((v) As a side note, some examples of gaps bridged in inferring noumena from phenomenology also included the angle of how experienced discreteness has been common to most if not not all of the average human experience of consciousness, and not just classical reality, as evidenced via the disappearing of experience for biological human awareness in deep sleep. Other aspects of experienced reality and starting points towards what can be inferred regarding noumena as well as the relationships between the two, as well as practical implications towards better understanding and better navigability have also been considered in this essay.) (Essay on Connecting Phenomenology and Noumena, and Practical Implications)

2. Whether current leadership takes better steps or not, it is established better ways that are more coherent are better for interests and happen to overlap with rational better practice, and so the civilizational model is not arbitrarily exempt from coherence, rather, it seems more possible due to loose ends being created by unnecessary excessive human made suffering even for perpetrating lobbies that we are running or carrying forward a civilizational error to be corrected that would preserve regular but even hidden interests better while sorting our certain loose ends and yet overlap with better evolved “practical morality”, rather than civilization being currently run in a default state and thus having to be erroneously accepted as it is, and operated within an erroneous ceiling of. It seems our model has carried forward dead weight due to which the entropy civilization faces is needlessly increased to our detriment in such unnecessary additional suffering inflicted upon our species and others, at least in neglect, in ways that prove to be worse paths even for interests perpetrating such than smarter alternatives that happen to be more humane, as has been evidenced by our recent case study of policy and its results since September 22 2023 (details in the note at the end).  We have also explored via this (i) how the civilizational model is also able to be, and naturally, more coherent than it is, with interests preserved, especially in solving for or reducing current civilizational errors and the additional loose ends they create. This way, one is aware that it is not arbitrary or illogical, instead there are artificial, illogical human ceilings which can be overcome to better and a process of better, whether we see such in our lifetimes or not, with an example starter path even being offered. This adds to point 1 in that what is experienced in “experienced waking reality” may be more coherent than, at times, understood by rationality, and there may be fewer gaps in understandability than assumed. I exclude in this summary how even the starter path outlined realistically covers AI integration, all sentience, better secured positions for stubborn interests such as lobbies and more, without requiring funding and without any hidden angles, and is practically possible and better for interests, as that is not the purpose of this list. As the purpose is to reduce unnecessary human-made suffering realistically, without loose ends, and stubborn lobbies will continue to exist or be replaced, this does not impose upon secrets or hidden dealings/finances/covert interests in order to protect civilians more than before and heal, versus trying radical overhauls to similar systems and unknowns returning, and only recommends more humane practices towards masses, where possible, while mapping out how it is more realistic and current options that hurt masses more are less realistic to sustained lobbies interests. The purpose of this has also been that (ii) even if a counter pitch changing every detail is raised that is game free, inclusive of all sentience and works, that is welcome, as another point here is a conversation begins towards more evolved ways, not of top-down approaches but of trimming the excesses in unnecessary civilisational cruelty, where interests are preserved and the natural way continues (with even eating meat, hunting, prior natural freedoms and hidden interests being preserved so as to trim suffering with approval and without radical overhaul, which may result in the same erroneous pattern returning), so a foundation for dialogue towards better, and eventual systems, such as a non imposing, all-culture/nuance respecting side-running, game free global constitution is introduced as a smoothly-running background software to 14000 years of civilizational data regarding trials and errors, various models attempted and learning curves, tangible and increased intangible potentials of abundance such as via the digital sphere now, and interest balancing with masses rights, and the rights of all possible sentience, while interests are better preserved than in the excesses of a more rudimentary present model. This has been mapped out in detail in Universal Sentience Reform (or that as a starting point for a better pitch in response) and while my starter recommendation cannot be cherry-picked, as a combined framework, it accounts for balancing these areas. (Essay on Intelligent Empire Building and Universal Sentience Reform)

For 3 and 4, perhaps being on the side of real truth, unbiased and without ulterior motive is fundamental to a fundamental sustained interaction with reality and stabilizing within it to calibrate into its deeper levels. 

3. We explored, for any interested, secularly demystifying enlightenment as recorded in history from various disciplines and found some pattern of understanding and doing duty within natural conditions in which one happens to be, or making amends and cleaning one’s path where possible, alongside either improving health and mental calibration or, at the very least, the intent directed to the possibility of such, when able, alongside 1-20-more minutes of meditation aimed towards virtue (after which the conscious mind just focuses on the present, knowing one’s ancient biological technology will know how to direct that) in order to get accustomed to the present and self allow calibration, while following any natural desires, callings or impulses in their most ethical forms, while allowing for a system of morality (explained ahead) to emerge to cleanse one’s actions, and then stepping back with a better balanced and calibrated cycle of living into experiencing reality via direct perception, as one may get the chance to grow into their natural best potential, such as a tree being actualized by ideal soil and sun conditions, while understanding reality better than before and also thus being able to navigate it better (better being defined in the essay). Some lineages also mention service towards or for other beings and gratitude and self reflection and growth as a mindset towards better calibration. More details and the sources or lineages from where this information was gathered are mentioned in the essay. (Essay on Secularly Demystifying the Enlightenment Process)

4. How practical morality or ethics (defined in the essay) may be irreducible in not losing out via opportunity costs on better actualization, navigability, noise distortion reduction, path clearing and a better understanding of experienced reality, and how it can be explored, either via one’s own spiritual lineage of choice in its most unbiased forms or, if not understood, by considering either a) cross cultural anthropological practical morality in (i) relative absolutes: traits that emerge cross culturally across history, and keep returning as moral values and (ii) relative relatives: those specific to overlaps between certain cultures, that also happen to overlap with general noble principles of lineages or intent, and to then try to hedge one’s interests against what is understood of morality and what resonates in order that one may responsibly shift to morality, as self understood based in anthropology, when it is possible to and interests are secured, and so better practical ways of navigating reality in more noble ways can emerge, so the actualization in point 3 may be towards highest possible understandable potentials. Regarding optimal morality practically, it’s not that immoral ways can’t work, it’s that moral ways can ALSO work and within them, certain kinds of calibration and actualization may be noted that specializations may have to compromise on as specializations are on limited reason whereas morality serves as noise distortion reduction and more authentic and justifiable actions, within which potentials can emerge with a system of healthier navigation. Now how to discern morality, I sense, is best via anthropology over the longest time scales cross culturally to see what kept returning independently to more sustained results (animal natures are understanding too and can have their reasons and then other, baser natures can be more understandable in coming forward in history; it’s the higher or noble natures returning that, in my opinion, can be surprising and this is elaborated upon with justifications in the essay) OR b) your own lineages highest, most unbiased values, provided, arguably, the historical and anthropological aspect is also present, even if they happened to be misunderstood at times, or misused by some. Interesting to note as per examples on my profile or in other essays that even civilization and its lobbies showed errors overtime in compromising morality too much, although morality on its own in that case would be incomplete without state efficiency, as justified in the essay, etc. (Essay on Cross-Cultural Anthropological Practical Morality) 

These are some foundations through which, I hope, some clarity may have emerged for those interested, and who agree with the essays’ axioms/directions, regarding demystifying the lived experience and ways to navigate it, so that one may be able to navigate it better or have more clarity on which to ask or base further questions. Other works include fictional poems as part of a book of poems I’m writing called a Casket and a Basket (it has its own puzzles, laws of physics and fourth wall breaking, I call my genre flimsy whimsy!), essays on (what I call) directional forces, symbolic connectors, the rules of sets within the universal context, anomalies, works of other philosophers taken forward, and more!

Thank you for reading! 

Note:

2. Alternately, We have established (i) the civilizational model perpetuated as it is being perpetuated is proving self detrimental and unnecessary this way, with a gentle, responsible, data based upgrade, with some renovations and some trimming or responsible further optimization being necessary even for perpetrators, as the current model is proving it is causing the downfall of prior leading places and bringing new parties into the same cycle (Israel’s government, via Sep 22 2023, and ignored border control and Intel within even two weeks after, then defaming and weakening the West as explained in a pinned post, justifying BRICS, building new Irans in the form of grieved new groups and India and China, and all neutrals who weren’t dragged into such errors, etc while the West is seeing the Mughal/Mongol etc decline needlessly, showing the places that won are recreating the artificial wall of decline), and that it thus creates needless lags in repeated cycles and loose ends, risks setting us back, increases existential risk beyond what is necessary and possible interruptions to the understanding of reality and optimally operating or living within it, while it seems to needlessly be distracting and setting us back in being able to operate in and explore, build and understand the one chance we can know, as per common knowledge, at least, we have in reality when reality shows possible coherence on way more levels, while the civilizational model assumes, possibly incorrectly, that an arbitrarily chosen present wall must remain, remembering how such extractive actions necessarily implode or are replaced by worse barbarians or other models, and have attempted (ii) starter brainstorming upgrade/renovation recommendations to keep and upgrade the status quo, improved, versus the radical overhaul leadership is trying to create which is resulting in its own decline, recommendations that incorporate history, data, interests and more, (you may develop and add to or improve upon these, the wish was that work and explorations of these areas should begin) so we may try taking the model forward with possible loose ends, challenges and implications considered and incorporated (also pinned as two posts, with details in recent other posts).