Morality explained and interference in my phone

Points regarding my morality notes made on April 16 2025 at 5:54-5:56 am have been deleted by phone interference but exist in prior essays. 

I’m also not being allowed to copy paste things so, as often the case, am rewriting them all over. 

Some points regarding why morality is better and even smarter (all terms defined in prior writings: the expanded essay on cross cultural anthropological practical morality and chapters 1-4 of components of existence)-where evil may lead to specializations, morality can too in more substantiated ways without as many loose ends and the compromise of possible limited reason being used as a tool whereas morality forces the mental expansion of reason within and into truths, underlying truths having been established in other essays and evidenced even in the sciences, with an example of a tree best actualizing in more appropriate soil and sun conditions, a human with biological code and an environment to navigate may also be best actualized most fully in integrating into underlying truths, experiencing noise distortion reduction as a result in observation, understanding and navigation, and being forced to embed any desires and wishes within such truths of reality to the opportunity to have expanded reason reorienting or calibrating the human better, even if actualization results in expansion beyond baseline conditions or outcomes, imperfectly metaphorically explained in how some seeds can expand into not just a tree but also fruits. The absence can result in a life lived with limited reason and to opportunity costs in fuller actualization, thus it is even more intelligent to be more and morality should be glamorized, not corruption or any accumulation of resources or show of force in the absence of verifiable underlying morality.